Rising political interventions in oil and gas markets
From deglobalisation to potential shortages, policymakers must be mindful of the law of unintended consequences
The COVID-19 pandemic led to more government intervention in energy markets in economies across the globe. Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, state involvement—from sanctions to price caps—became even more intensive, upending global oil and gas flows, and not necessarily in ways desired or intended. Getting the right policy balance is at the heart of good energy policy. Examples of ‘bad’ government intervention are efforts to influence energy prices, often leading to adverse impacts. Attempts to cap prices fall into this category. Legislating limits to energy prices only leads to reduced incentive to provide more energy and encourages waste. Aggressive price freezes and caps can lead
Also in this section
4 December 2025
Time is running out for Lukoil and Rosneft to divest international assets that will be mostly rendered useless to them when the US sanctions deadline arrives in mid-December
3 December 2025
Aramco’s pursuit of $30b in US gas partnerships marks a strategic pivot. The US gains capital and certainty; Saudi Arabia gains access, flexibility and a new export future
2 December 2025
The interplay between OPEC+, China and the US will define oil markets throughout 2026
1 December 2025
The North African producer’s first bidding round in almost two decades is an important milestone but the recent extension suggests a degree of trepidation







