Rising political interventions in oil and gas markets
From deglobalisation to potential shortages, policymakers must be mindful of the law of unintended consequences
The COVID-19 pandemic led to more government intervention in energy markets in economies across the globe. Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, state involvement—from sanctions to price caps—became even more intensive, upending global oil and gas flows, and not necessarily in ways desired or intended. Getting the right policy balance is at the heart of good energy policy. Examples of ‘bad’ government intervention are efforts to influence energy prices, often leading to adverse impacts. Attempts to cap prices fall into this category. Legislating limits to energy prices only leads to reduced incentive to provide more energy and encourages waste. Aggressive price freezes and caps can lead
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58a71/58a719b6c73effff63906d66236ab511869d46dd" alt=""
Also in this section
21 February 2025
While large-scale planned LNG schemes in sub-Saharan Africa have faced fresh problems, FLNG projects are stepping into that space
20 February 2025
Greater social mobility means increased global demand for refined fuels and petrochemical products, with Asia leading the way in the expansion of refining capacity
19 February 2025
The EU would do well to ease its gas storage requirements to avoid heavy purchase costs this summer, with the targets having created market distortion while giving sellers a significant advantage over buyers
18 February 2025
Deliveries to China decline by around 1m b/d from move to curb crude exports to Shandong port, putting Iran under further economic pressure