A tale of two regulatory landscapes: the UK and Norway
The stark contrasts between the UK and Norway demonstrate how policy stability can shape the long-term trajectory of a mature basin
The UK and Norway share the geology of the North Sea, but their oil and gas regulatory climates could scarcely be more different: where Norway provides consistency and long-term certainty, the UK has veered through cycles of policy instability from government to government. Mixed signals UK authorities have sent very mixed signals about the future of North Sea oil and gas over recent years. Just a decade ago, the government was strongly promoting investment, for example through tax allowances that spurred the development of several 100m bl projects. Then in 2019, the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) regulator temporarily paused licensing to assess whether its policies were in line with
Also in this section
6 January 2026
Cash will be needed to boost production by 30% to meet region’s rapidly rising power demand, executives told the inaugural Middle East Gas Conference in December
6 January 2026
The vast liquefaction capacity being developed in the region, led by the US, is transforming the market
6 January 2026
Less than two years after its launch, the World Bank’s Global Flaring and Methane Reduction Partnership is supporting abatement in 17 countries, but with flaring at a near-two-decade peak and methane emissions stubbornly high, there is work to do
6 January 2026
Companies are bullish despite combined effect of market volatility, tariff threats, regulatory issues and midstream constraints
