Newsletters | Request Trial | Log in | Advertise | Digital Issue   |   Search
  • Upstream
  • Midstream & Downstream
  • Gas & LNG
  • Trading & Markets
  • Corporate & Finance
  • Geopolitics
  • Podcasts
Search
Martin Quinlan
18 February 2015
Follow @PetroleumEcon
Forward article link
Share PDF with colleagues

Norway's Johan Sverdrup plan sparks licence dispute

Participants in the vast Johan Sverdrup oilfield have submitted a development plan - but are in dispute over ownership interests

Statoil and partners in the Johan Sverdrup field - one of Norway's largest discoveries - met their target of submitting a plan for development and operation (PDO) in February, but have asked the ministry of petroleum to settle an extraordinary dispute over the field's unitisation. At stake is the distribution of production revenues estimated to total $180 billion over 50 years, and the sharing of up to $29bn of development costs. The dispute sets Norway's Det Norske Oljeselskap - a small Trondheim-based company, with a production of 63,000 barrels of oil equivalent a day (boe/d) - against heavyweights Statoil and Lundin, the companies which drilled the two Johan Sverdrup discovery wells, in

Also in this section
High hopes and dry wells in the Black Sea
22 April 2026
The failure of OMV Petrom’s keenly watched exploration campaign at Bulgaria’s Han Asparuh block highlights the Black Sea’s uneven track record, despite major successes like Neptun Deep and Sakarya
Drone power: Ukraine escalates its war on Russian oil
22 April 2026
Sustained strikes on ports, terminals and refineries are testing the resilience of Russia’s oil export system, yet rapid repairs, rerouting and surging prices mean the campaign has yet to deliver a decisive blow
OPEC+ caught between a crisis and a surplus
21 April 2026
After overcoming a COVID-induced demand collapse with several years of successful market management, geopolitical events have conspired to provide the pact’s biggest test to date
Letter from Iran: Nuclear miscalculation
Opinion
21 April 2026
The regime’s policy of using nuclear ambiguity as a deterrent may have failed but it has realised it has other cards to play, while its neighbours are reappraising their approach to security

Share PDF with colleagues

COPYRIGHT NOTICE: PDF sharing is permitted internally for Petroleum Economist Gold Members only. Usage of this PDF is restricted by <%= If(IsLoggedIn, User.CompanyName, "")%>’s agreement with Petroleum Economist – exceeding the terms of your licence by forwarding outside of the company or placing on any external network is considered a breach of copyright. Such instances are punishable by fines of up to US$1,500 per infringement
Send

Forward article Link

Send
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Project Data
Maps
Podcasts
Social Links
Featured Video
Home
  • About us
  • Subscribe
  • Reaching your audience
  • PE Store
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws © 2025 The Petroleum Economist Ltd
Cookie Settings
;

Search