Newsletters | Request Trial | Log in | Advertise | Digital Issue   |   Search
  • Upstream
  • Midstream & Downstream
  • Gas & LNG
  • Trading & Markets
  • Corporate & Finance
  • Geopolitics
  • Podcasts
Search
William Powell
London
30 September 2015
Follow @PetroleumEcon
Forward article link
Share PDF with colleagues

Total aims to cut assets by $10bn by 2017

Almost a year in the job, Total’s new CEO has made cost-cutting and disposals his priorities as oil prices give little encouragement

Total is having to make the best of a bad job: like its peers it is heavily invested in projects that rely on high oil prices, backed up by strong demand growth. So the French major is facing tough decisions about which projects to sell, which to retain, and which sectors to get out of altogether. So far this year it has sold $3.3bn of assets and hopes to bring this figure to $10bn by 2017. The consequences for its future growth are serious. Total has had problems with shale gas licenses in Denmark, where it was the only foreign investor to win a license; and in Poland. But there remain hopes for its activities upstream in the UK where it won licenses in the 14th onshore round last month and

Also in this section
High hopes and dry wells in the Black Sea
22 April 2026
The failure of OMV Petrom’s keenly watched exploration campaign at Bulgaria’s Han Asparuh block highlights the Black Sea’s uneven track record, despite major successes like Neptun Deep and Sakarya
Drone power: Ukraine escalates its war on Russian oil
22 April 2026
Sustained strikes on ports, terminals and refineries are testing the resilience of Russia’s oil export system, yet rapid repairs, rerouting and surging prices mean the campaign has yet to deliver a decisive blow
OPEC+ caught between a crisis and a surplus
21 April 2026
After overcoming a COVID-induced demand collapse with several years of successful market management, geopolitical events have conspired to provide the pact’s biggest test to date
Letter from Iran: Nuclear miscalculation
Opinion
21 April 2026
The regime’s policy of using nuclear ambiguity as a deterrent may have failed but it has realised it has other cards to play, while its neighbours are reappraising their approach to security

Share PDF with colleagues

COPYRIGHT NOTICE: PDF sharing is permitted internally for Petroleum Economist Gold Members only. Usage of this PDF is restricted by <%= If(IsLoggedIn, User.CompanyName, "")%>’s agreement with Petroleum Economist – exceeding the terms of your licence by forwarding outside of the company or placing on any external network is considered a breach of copyright. Such instances are punishable by fines of up to US$1,500 per infringement
Send

Forward article Link

Send
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Project Data
Maps
Podcasts
Social Links
Featured Video
Home
  • About us
  • Subscribe
  • Reaching your audience
  • PE Store
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws © 2025 The Petroleum Economist Ltd
Cookie Settings
;

Search