US renewables receive unfair advantage
State administrations are using a flawed metric to justify green energy projects
State governments in the US are pushing a green thumb on the energy policy scale. Cost-benefit studies commissioned by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, for example, determined that the benefits of several proposed (and recently cancelled by the developers’) offshore wind projects were twice their costs, despite those projects’ contractual purchase prices for electricity that were 3–4 times higher than wholesale market prices. The reason: the estimated reductions in carbon emissions accounted for 60% of the total benefits. However, the state used a flawed measurement, the social cost of carbon (SCC), to calculate the benefits of CO₂ reductions and justify projects that, if built, wou
Also in this section
28 November 2025
The launch of the bloc’s emissions trading system in 2005 was a pioneering step, but as the scheme hits 21 its impact as a driver of decarbonisation is still open to debate
18 November 2025
Vicki Hollub, president and CEO of Occidental, has been selected as the 2026 recipient of the Dewhurst Award, the highest honour bestowed by WPC Energy. The Dewhurst Award celebrates exceptional leadership, groundbreaking innovation and a lifetime of significant achievements in sup-port of the development and advancement of the energy industry.
11 November 2025
Transition policies must recognise that significant industrial demand for carbon will continue even as economies hit net zero
6 November 2025
After years of pursuing ideologically driven climate leadership, Western powers are now stepping back under mounting political pressure and rising populist opposition—prompting concern essential climate action could be sidelined
