Newsletters | Request Trial | Log in | Advertise | Digital Issue   |   Search
  • CCUS
  • Cap & Trade Markets
  • Voluntary Markets & Offsets
  • Corporate & Finance
  • Net Zero Strategies
  • Podcasts
Search
Alessandro Vitelli
2 October 2017
Follow @PetroleumEcon
Forward article link
Share PDF with colleagues

The other damaging glut

Emissions-trading systems have suffered from an oversupply of permits. Regulators are trying to fix that and show the mechanisms can still work

As countries from Kazakhstan to Mexico weigh up the pros and cons of establishing carbon trading as part of their contributions to the Paris Agreement, the oldest markets are still striving to tackle their chronic problem: oversupply. The three main systems in operation, the EU's Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) in the northeast US and California's state-wide system, all suffer from gluts of unused permits. This has depressed prices and allowed industrial emitters to buy their way to compliance instead of making changes to their energy-intensive processes. Critics say this proves carbon markets are ineffective and carbon taxes should replace in

Also in this section
Energy cost surge fires up debate over EU ETS
12 March 2026
Role of world’s largest carbon cap-and-trade market under scrutiny as war in Iran threatens to drive EU energy costs to unsustainable levels
Letter on carbon: Capturing Europe’s elusive CCS potential
10 March 2026
Europe urgently needs to bring more projects to FID, as CCS investors warn they might divert capital to faster-growing regions
Outlook 2026: The case for carbon stewardship
Outlook 2026
9 January 2026
A shift in perspective is needed on the carbon challenge, the success of which will determine the speed and extent of emissions cuts and how industries adapt to the new environment
Outlook 2026: Carbon capture in the US – Milestones and the road ahead
Outlook 2026
2 January 2026
This year may be a defining one for carbon capture, utilisation and storage in the US, despite the institutional uncertainty

Share PDF with colleagues

COPYRIGHT NOTICE: PDF sharing is permitted internally for Petroleum Economist Gold Members only. Usage of this PDF is restricted by <%= If(IsLoggedIn, User.CompanyName, "")%>’s agreement with Petroleum Economist – exceeding the terms of your licence by forwarding outside of the company or placing on any external network is considered a breach of copyright. Such instances are punishable by fines of up to US$1,500 per infringement
Send

Forward article Link

Send
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Project Data
Maps
Podcasts
Social Links
Featured Video
Home
  • About us
  • Subscribe
  • Reaching your audience
  • PE Store
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws © 2025 The Petroleum Economist Ltd
Cookie Settings
;

Search