Independent producers’ scope three dilemma
Is it enough for pureplay upstream firms to concentrate solely on emissions within their control?
More than 80pc of a barrel of oil’s carbon footprint is scope three emissions. But an independent producer, having sold its share of output from a field, no longer has a say on where that oil goes, into what it is refined and, ultimately, how it is combusted and releases most of its CO₂. There are, in fact, few—if any—barrels these days that remain in a single pair of hands from production, through transportation (including potential shipborne resales), refining and distribution, to retail, begging the question what roles traders, refiners and distributors might have to assume in a future where a matrix for sharing responsibility for scope three emissions must surely emerge. But, at least un

Also in this section
30 January 2025
The UAE’s oil and gas company puts its faith in technologies including CCS and AI to deliver its emission-reduction goals
27 January 2025
Regional state-owned firms are transforming their strategies and leveraging their resources to position themselves as clean energy powerhouses, and to ensure they maintain influence in a low-carbon world
24 January 2025
Progress on the energy transition has slowed or even stopped, with greater societal engagement we can revitalise it
23 January 2025
The return of Donald Trump gives further evidence of ‘big oil’ as an investable asset, with the only question being whether anyone is really surprised